Returning to non-entailed presuppositions again
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
non-corrective approach to pronunciation
the aim of this study has been to find answers for the following questions: 1. what is the effect of immediate correction on students pronunciation errors? 2. what would be the effect of teaching the more rgular patterns of english pronunciation? 3. is there any significant difference between the two methods of dealing with pronuciation errore, i. e., correction and the teaching of the regular ...
15 صفحه اولPacking Non-Returning A-Paths
Chudnovsky et al. gave a min-max formula for the maximum number of node-disjoint non-zero A-paths in group-labeled graphs [1], which is a generalization of Mader’s theorem on node-disjoint A-paths [3]. Here we present a further generalization with a shorter proof. The main feature of Theorem 2.1 is that parity is “hidden” inside ν̂, which is given by an oracle for non-bipartite matching.
متن کاملMost Complex Non-returning Regular Languages
A regular language L is non-returning if in the minimal deterministic finite automaton accepting it there are no transitions into the initial state. Eom, Han and Jirásková derived upper bounds on the state complexity of boolean operations and Kleene star, and proved that these bounds are tight using two different binary witnesses. They derived upper bounds for concatenation and reversal using t...
متن کاملFocus Presuppositions
This paper reviews notions related to focus and presupposition and addresses the hypothesis that focus triggers an existential presuppostion. Presuppostion projection behavior in certain examples appears to favor a presuppositional analysis of focus. It is argued that these examples are open to a different analysis using givenness theory. Overall, the analysis favors a weak semantics for focus ...
متن کاملPacking non-returning A-paths algorithmically
In this paper we present an algorithmic approach to packing A-paths. It is regarded as a generalization of Edmonds’ matching algorithm, however there is the significant difference that here we do not build up any kind of alternating tree. Instead we use the so-called 3-way lemma, which either provides augmentation, or a dual, or a subgraph which can be used for contraction. The method works in ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: ZAS Papers in Linguistics
سال: 2018
ISSN: 1435-9588
DOI: 10.21248/zaspil.61.2018.507